Ramayana
is not a myth, says S.R. Rao
Special Correspondent
His
excavations near Dwaraka found parts of the town where Lord Krishna
lived
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Discovery
of the submerged Kusasthali Dwaraka is a historical truth'
'Tradition
depicts Hampi in Karnataka as Kishkindha, a place visited by Rama'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bangalore:
The President of the Society for Marine Archaeology in India,
S.R.Rao, said that Ramayana cannot be dismissed as a myth, just
as it was done earlier in the case of Mahabharata.
In
a press release, the former scientist emeritus said that the discovery
of the submerged Kusasthali Dwaraka is a historical truth now
and the experts had dubbed Mahabharata as a myth.
In
the case of Ramayana, he said strong tradition depicts Hampi in
Karnataka as Kishkindha, which was visited by Rama. The culture
of Kishkindha at that time was of Neolithic levels, it said.
Discovery
Prof. Rao, who undertook deep-sea excavations near Dwaraka, discovered
the submerged parts of the town where Krishna lived when he was
the director of National Institute of Oceanography. He said that
the culture (seen in Kishkindha) has several Neolithic sites spread
over Patapadu and Pusalpadu in Bellary district. Another important
site is Bandi Pushala Chenu in Bellary-Kurnool area where excavations
of the typical Harappan steatite wheel-like beads are found. These
beads occur in all Harappan sites as early as 3000 BC. Bithur
near Kanpur, a traditional Ramayana site, had yielded weapons
of the culture, archeologically designated as ochre-coloured pottery
(OCP), ranging from 1500 to 2000 BC or even 3000 BC near Ghaneswar
in Rajasthan.
Excavations
at the Neolithic culture site at Mahagara in the Belan valley
of Uttar Pradesh yielded rice dated around 4000 BC. Further north-west
in Pakistan, the cotton growing Neolithic culture is 7,000 years
old (5000 BC). When Rama came to Kishkindha, the Vanaras were
the same Neolithic people, whose help he took, said Prof. Rao.
The
archaeological dating of Neolotihic culture ranged from 4000 BC
in Uttar Pradesh to 7600 BC. in pre-Harappan sites of Pakistan.
On this basis, Ramayana should be dated at least to 3000 BC, if
not earlier. The Mahabharata, he said, mentioned Ramayana, while
the Ramayana did not mention Mahabharata. There is no negative
evidence to say that Ramayana was a myth. Ramayana is built on
a core of truth depicting the life of a particular people and
period, Prof. Rao added.
© Copyright 2000 - 2006 The Hindu