Question: Did you know where
the famous Bower manuscript was found and what is its importance
for Ayurvedic Studies?
The Bower Manuscript (mss), which is named after its discoverer,
Lieutenant H. Bower, was found in 1890, in Kuchar, in Eastern Turkestan,
on the great caravan route of China. It was then sent to Colonel
J. Waterhouse, who was then the President of Asiatic Society of
Bengal. On reaching Calcutta in February 1891, it was taken over
by the famous epigraphist and indologist Hoernle who was at that
time the Philological Secretary of the Asiatic Society of Bengal.
After the completion of its editing, Hoernle returned it to Bower
in 1898.
The Bower Manuscript in reality
is a collection of seven distinct manuscripts, or it may be called
a collective manuscript of seven parts. The total of the existing
leaves of the Bower Manuscript is fifty-one. But unfortunately the
more important portion of it, Parts I- III, which deals with medicine,
is incomplete.
Detailed studies of the mss
indicated to Hoernle that the writers of Parts I- III and Parts
V-VII were Indian Buddhist monks. The mss is written in Indian Gupta
script. The use of birch-bark for writing shows that they must have
come from Kashmir or Udyana. Hoernle thinks that they passed the
mss into the hands of the writer of Part IV, who would seem to have
been a native of Eastern Turkestan, or perhaps of China. But the
ultimate owner of the whole series of manuscripts, Yasomitra, must
have held a prominent position in that monastery. For this collective
manuscript was contained in the relic chamber of the memorial stupa
at the Ming-oi of Qum Tura, built in his honour.
The large medical treatise
called Navanitaka forms the second part of the Bower mss. As the
date of that mss falls somewhere in the second half of the fourth
century A.D., and as the Navanitaka quotes numerous formulae from
the Cikitsita-sthana of Charaka's Compendium, it seems obvious that
none of the chapters of the latter, from which quotations occur
in the Navanitaka, can have been written by the famous physician
Drdhabala, who lived several centuries later, probably in the ninth
century A.D. The date of the composition of the Navanitaka is probably
much earlier than that of the writing of the Bower mss, in which
it has been preserved for us. "That the latter is not the autograph
of the author of the Navanitaka, but is a copy of a pre-existing
work, is proved by various marks in the mss." Hoernle holds
the view that the Navanitaka being later in date than the Caraka-samhita,
and of the latter work (in the form in which it at the time existed,
before its revision and completion by Drdhabala) having been one
of the sources drawn on by the author of the Navanitaka.
Sources
Hoernle, A. F. R. 1909. The Composition of the Caraka-Samita in
the Light of the Bower Manuscript. Reprinted in Studies in the History
of Science in India. 1982. Vol. I. (Ed) Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya.
New Delhi: Editorial Enterprises. Pp. 141-174.
Hoernle, A. F. R. 1909. The
Bower Manuscript. Reprinted in Studies in the History of Science
in India. 1982. Vol. I. (Ed.) Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya. New Delhi:
Editorial Enterprises. Pp. 116- 140.
Back to "Did
You Know?" Archive
|