Nature 414, 407 - 409 (2001)
© Macmillan Publishers Ltd
HENRY GEE
Henry Gee is a senior editor
at Nature.
e-mail: h.gee@nature.com
Some curious fossils
from the Cambrian period have been grouped into a new phylum, the
Vetulicolia. All of its members are extinct, and their unusual anatomy
tempts evolutionary speculation.
Researchers engaged in acts
of discovery sometimes have to confront the truly strange and make
sense of it. Many of the fossils from the Cambrian Period (about
543510 million years ago) are cases in point, for they defy
comparison with living creatures. In this seeming 'explosion' of
life, evolution was toying with many different designs. If all living
things share a common ancestor, even the strangest fossil creature
must be related to something more intelligible, whether living or
long-since dead. Identifying these relatives can be a daunting task.
Such is the problem faced by
Shu and colleagues, who on page
419 of this issue1
describe and discuss several fossil animals from the Chengjiang
fauna of southern China. This is a remarkable assemblage of exotic
forms, comparable with and slightly older than the
fossils of the famous Burgess Shale of western Canada. Shu et al.
describe the exquisite fossils of an unusual, partially segmented
creature (see Fig. 1 on page
420) and, in an extended comparison with three other known fossils
(Figs 25), create a new phylum a natural group of animals
united by a distinctive body plan. They suggest that this phylum,
which they call the Vetulicolia, is part of the Deuterostomia, the
'superphyletic' group that includes echinoderms (starfishes, sea
urchins and allies), hemichordates (the obscure acorn-worms and
pterobranchs) and chordates (vertebrates, including ourselves, as
well as tunicates and the amphioxus Branchiostoma). The relationships
of these various groups are outlined in Fig.
1.
Figure 1 The deuterostomes,
and possible places for vetulicolians in the evolutionary scheme
of events. Full
legendHigh resolution image and legend (30k)
Interpretation of any problematic
fossil is a risky business. Interpreting presumably adult forms
of an unusual fossil as deuterostomes is riskier still, because
the defining characters of deuterostomes are conventionally embryological
and will not show up in adults. However, molecular work suggests
there is a close alliance between hemichordates, which have structures
called pharyngeal slits, and echinoderms, which do not, at least
in living forms2.
This conclusion implies that some features seen in adult chordates
and hemichordates in particular the pharyngeal slits
might be characteristics of deuterostomes in general. Shu and colleagues
present evidence that vetulicolians, like hemichordates and chordates,
have pharyngeal slits; this finding, among others, aligns them with
deuterostomes. If this interpretation is correct, vetulicolians
represent a new, primitive deuterostome body plan that could shed
light on the long-vexed question of vertebrate origins.
The vetulicolian fossils are
just a few centimetres long, and are united by several characteristics,
including a markedly bipartite body. The anterior half is voluminous
and sac-like, with a large opening at the front regarded
as the mouth and five pairs of lateral openings. Shu and
colleagues interpret these features as pharyngeal slits. At least
some vetulicolians have a trace of a groove or cleft on the inside
surface of the floor of the anterior cavity, which Shu et al. interpret
as an endostyle. The endostyle a characteristic feature of
chordates is a gland-rich gutter in the ventral floor of
the pharynx. The mucus it produces lubricates the inside of the
pharynx, where it traps and concentrates food particles. It also,
incidentally, concentrates iodine. The candidate endostyle of vetulicolians
is similar in position to those of tunicates and the amphioxus.
The filter-feeding larvae of lampreys are the only vertebrates to
retain an endostyle. On metamorphosis, the endostyle becomes the
adult thyroid gland. Neither echinoderms nor hemichordates are thought
to have an endostyle, which appears to be a uniquely chordate feature.
The posterior half of the vetulicolians
is divided into seven segments. A structure interpreted as a gut
runs along the entire length of the posterior section, which looks
remarkably arthropod-like. Indeed, the authors remark that the entire
animal looks much like a small shrimp. But vetulicolians appear
to have been limbless, and no arthropod exists that has traded all
its limbs for pharyngeal slits.
Where do the vetulicolians
fit into deuterostome evolution? The authors' assertion that these
creatures were 'basal deuterostomes' that is, deuterostomes
that branched off the main lineage before the echinoderms, hemichordates
and chordates became distinct is properly cautious, given
the difficulties inherent in interpreting unusual fossils. To assert
that vetulicolians were more or less close to specific deuterostome
groups might be asking more of the evidence than it can stand. External
commentators, however, like court jesters, have licence to be more
reckless.
Looking at the distribution
of features in vetulicolians, and mapping them onto a deuterostome
phylogeny (Fig.
1), you could make a case that these animals are akin to chordates,
rather than deuterostomes in general. This would then make vetulicolians
directly relevant to the question of vertebrate ancestry. In short,
the latest common ancestor of chordates would have looked rather
like a vetulicolian. The only real difference would be that vetulicolians
lack a notochord the axial, stiffening rod that all chordates
have at some stage in their life cycle. The amphioxus has a notochord
throughout life; tunicates lose it as adults, and in most vertebrates
it is supplanted by the vertebral column. Shu and colleagues do
not find compelling evidence for a notochord in vetulicolians.
Nonetheless, the vetulicolian
body plan is close to what could be regarded as archetypal for the
most primitive chordates. In the early 1970s, A. S. Romer3
speculated that the vertebrate body was an amalgam of two separate
entities: the 'visceral' and the 'somatic'. The visceral animal
corresponds with the internal organs, musculature (characteristically
smooth) and associated innervation; the somatic part includes the
skeleton, the musculature of the body wall (generally striated),
the central nervous system and the sense organs.
Romer used this 'dual-animal'
model as a device to explain the course of vertebrate evolution.
He argued that primitive chordates, such as tunicates, are all viscera
little more than a sac-like pharynx and gut with the most
rudimentary neuronal apparatus. Vertebrates evolved by developing
the somatic part, originally as the organ of locomotion in the posterior
part of the animal a beginning can be seen in the locomotory
tail of tunicate tadpole larvae. In vertebrates, the somatic part
has grown forwards and dorsally, covering and finally encapsulating
the visceral part.
Perhaps the most striking feature
of the vetulicolians is the strong division of the animal into anterior
and posterior halves, just as Romer speculated. To a mind attuned
to prospective vertebrate ancestors, it is easy to look at a vetulicolian
and see for example a tunicate tadpole larva.
References
1. Shu, D. -G. et al. Nature
414, 419-424 (2001). | Article
| PubMed
|
2. Halanych, K. M. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4, 72-76 (1995).
| Article
| PubMed
|
3. Romer, A. S. Evol. Biol. 6, 121-156 (1972).
|