Want
a Boy? Eat your Wheaties
By Elsa Youngsteadt
ScienceNOW Daily News
23 April 2008
Moms
have more clout than they realize when it comes to the sex
of their children. A new study of British mothers suggests
that women who eat more--especially more breakfast cereal--at
the time of conception are more likely to have boys.
Births of boys are on the decline in several industrialized
countries, including the United States, the U.K., and Canada.
In the U.S., the proportion of male babies has dropped by
about 0.1% since 1970--a small but detectable decline that's
amounted to more than 38,000 "missing" boys. The
cause of the change is unknown, and some researchers have
blamed environmental contaminants that might interfere with
hormone balance or poison male embryos. But biologist Fiona
Mathews of the University of Exeter in the U.K. wondered
if there might be a less sinister force at work.
In
1973, biologist Robert Trivers and mathematician Dan Willard
predicted that to maximize the number of her descendents,
a mother should have some control over the sex of her offspring.
If she's healthy and has plenty of food, male offspring
are her best investment because they can produce more progeny
than can females. But a mediocre male cannot, so mothers
with limited resources are better off having girls.
If
human moms fit the Trivers-Willard prediction, Mathews and
her colleagues expected that women with a greater total
calorie intake should produce more boys. The team studied
a random sample of 721 pregnant women from southern England
who were expecting for the first time and didn't know the
sex of their fetuses. Each woman answered a detailed survey
about what she had been eating at the time of conception,
and the researchers divided the women into three categories
based on total calorie intake. In the highest-calorie group,
56% of the women had sons, compared to only 45% in the lowest-calorie
group. Much of the effect seemed to depend on whether a
woman ate breakfast or not. As the team reports online this
week in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 59% of moms
who ate at least one bowl of cereal per day had boys, compared
to only 43% of women who ate less than one bowl per week.
With fewer women eating breakfast, Mathews says that the
Trivers-Willard effect could be at least part of the explanation
for dropping sex ratios. Breakfast may be particularly important
for maintaining blood sugar levels, which have been linked
to increased production of males in other mammals, although
the precise mechanism is unknown (ScienceNOW, 30 November
2007).
Elissa
Cameron, a mammal ecologist at the University of Pretoria
in South Africa, says the results are convincing and important
as the first evidence for the Trivers-Willard hypothesis
in modern humans. But it's not clear whether nutrition is
the driving force behind the declining number of boys, says
Shanna Swan, an epidemiologist at the University of Rochester
School of Medicine and Dentistry in New York. She says that
if maternal diet is a factor, "it's undoubtedly not
the only one," and environmental contaminants could
still be part of the story.
Related
sites
More on the Trivers-Willard hypothesis
ScienceNOW on single moms having fewer sons