ROMESH DIWAN
In the past few weeks one has seen haunting images.
At the G -8 meeting in Genoa, Italy, leaders of the rich nations
met in fort like environment secured by iron railings and 20,000
Italian police, military and para military forces against 200,000
citizens gathered together to protest their hidden agendas. Police
brutality against some of these unarmed citizens is still being
discussed in European news media. The government heads were trying
to formulate globalization via trade and commerce. The large number
of citizens, on the other hand, were defining globalization in terms
of democratic rule, multicultural, multiethnic, multireligious diversity,
and an open society.
Few days later images shifted to gruesome attack
by Pakistan trained Mujahudeens of 15 innocent Hindu pilgrims in
their journey to holy Amarnath. Another 15 Hindus were massacred
in Doda District of Jammu and Kashmir by another section of Mujahudeens.
The Eurocentric Western media did not find non-white Hindu massacres
newsworthy. But the images of murders, whether white or non-white,
European or non-European, evoke the same feelings. More recently
a Mujahudeens human bomb exploded in a crowded restaurant in Jerusalem
killing innocent Jews. In Macedonian Muslim separatists are fighting
the government in gun battles. These facts and images also raise
serious questions about globalization. How does globalization relate
to minorities, safety and territorial disputes? The case of Israel
is both
illustrative and instructive.
The Jewish Israel state came into being fifty
plus years ago after the second world war and a major Jewish holocaust.
By every criteria - political democracy, per capita income,
quality of its health and education facilities, diversity of its
population - it is a modern state. Inspite of such achievements
and fifty years after its installation, it finds itself unable to
protect the life of its children and citizens. Israel also has a
large Muslim Palestine minority population who feel that they are
a second class citizen and are willing to fight to gain a separate
state.
The problem of a minority's feeling of second
class status is not limited to Israel alone. African - Americans
have similar feelings in the US. In fact many countries face similar
minority situation. Only in a few countries have this minority status
generated a violent conflict: namely, Bosnia, Croatia, Chechyna,
Kosovo, and currently uprisings in China, Macedonia, and Philippines.
All of these are Islamic minorities in a non Muslim state. The method
followed is an indiscriminate use of humans bombs against the "non
Muslims."
It is instructive to look at the states where
minorities exist but have not created such conflicts. There are
minorities in US, India, most major European countries; namely,
England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain.
Barring Spain where Basques have been asking for a separate state,
these minorities feel a certain sense of belonging to these countries.
On the other hand, there are a number of Muslim ruled countries
following Islamic laws that deny any rights to minorities.
In Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, non Muslims have little rights and no
citizenship. In Pakistan and Bangladesh, the minorities have been
continuously reduced by forced conversions and mini
genocides. Thus in 1950, after its establishment, Pakistan had 17
percent Hindu population; fifty years later, it is reduced to 3
- 5 percent. Same holds for Bangladesh. Even in Indian Kashmir,
thousands of Hindu Pundits have been forced out of their homes
and have been living in refugee camps for the last decade; this
in what is called, Hindu India. India, however, is a very soft state
which can not safeguard the life of its own majority
population.
Israel desires to maintain an open society while
its minorities wish a separate state. India and Serbia were divided.
Israel is too small to be divided; it's very existence is threatened.
Division of a country is not a solution. On the contrary it invites
the highest level of violence; as recently witnessed in Serbia.
Israel, alone, can't solve this problem.
The issue is not of minority and majority. It
is part of globalization. There is a fundamental value conflict.
The jihadi and Mujahudeen's value system is well defined. In it,
killing the non-Muslim -, child, innocent, old ,unarmed, woman -
is a heroic act that wins one the coveted honor of a martyr with
a promise of heaven and hurs. Rarely have these murder of innocent
people by Mujahudeens been criticized, much less condemned, by Muslim
spokespersons: heads of the Muslim government, Muslim religious
leaders, articulate and distinguished Muslim scholars, etc. On the
contrary, jihadis and Mujahudeens are now being produced wholesale
in madarassas in Talibanic Afghanistan and its supporters in Pakistan.
The production system is institutionalized and spreading to other
countries. This value system is highly conflictual with the values
of an open society which can not, and
does not, permit the killing of non-A by A. Instead, it places strong
restraints on such violent behavior. People who so act are denounced
as murders, imprisoned, even executed. They are not treated as heroes.
In Samuel Huntington's language, this is the civilizational clash.
In this clash India, Israel and Macedonia are on the front lines;
India is bleeding
slowly, Israel has its back to the wall, and Macedonia is experiencing
what other Balkan states have gone through. For the time, US and
Europe are basking in their openness on the backs of these front-line
states.
Ultimately, however, the real threat is to Europe and US which are
the greatest beneficiaries of globalization
G-8 leaders can talk all about economics and
trade. The greatest challenge to globalization of any kind is this
civilizational clash. It is a serious threat to any open society
necessary for globalization. The nature of globalization and its
eventual success or failure will depend not on trade regimes but,
fundamentally, how this civilizational clash is resolved.
Romesh Diwan, Professor of Economics
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180
diwanr@rpi.edu
|